RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS FLARE FOLLOWING COVID-19 VACCINATION IN MALAYSIAN POPULATION AND ITS ASSOCIATED RISK FACTORS

BackgroundFlare of Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) following COVID-19 vaccination has been reported with a low occurrence observed in those patients with disease remission. However, no local data is available in our multi-ethnic Malaysian population.ObjectivesTo evaluate the prevalence of RA flare in Malaysian patients following COVID-19 vaccination and its associated risk factors.MethodsThis was a cross-sectional study assessing RA flare based on patient-reported disease flare through self-administered questionnaires and physician-reported flare. Patient self-reported disease flare was defined as ‘a sudden worsening of rheumatology condition or arthritis within 1 month post-vaccination' while physician-reported flare was defined as ‘an increment of disease activity score 28-joint documented within 3 months post-vaccination‘ from either a scheduled or unscheduled clinic visit. A total of 186 RA patients attended the rheumatology clinic in Hospital Putrajaya from May to July 2022 who completed the primary COVID-19 vaccination under the Malaysian National Vaccination Programme were recruited. Demographic data, disease parameters including serology for rheumatoid factor (RF) and anti-citrullinated peptide antibodies (ACPA), cessation of disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) around vaccination, type of vaccines and adverse events were examined using descriptive and univariate analyses.ResultsMajority (93%) of RA patients enrolled were female with a mean age of 58 years old (standard deviation, SD 12.2) and mean disease duration was 12 years (SD 7.7). More than half were seropositive (66% RF, 63% ACPA) with 47.4% had double seropositivity (RF and ACPA positive). All patients received DMARDs with the majority (71%) were on methotrexate (MTX), 21.5% were on leflunomide, 17.7% on other DMARDs, with a small proportion (14%) of patients were receiving prednisolone. Only 4.8% of patients were on biologics or targeted synthetic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs. Half of the patients were in remission prior to vaccination. 62% of patients received Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine as the primary vaccine, followed by Sinovac-CoronaVac (24.6%) and Oxford-AstraZeneca (13.4%) vaccines. A booster dose had been administered to 80% of patients, of which 88.7% was Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine. MTX therapy were discontinued in 39.4% of patients (n=52) post-vaccination for a week duration. The prevalence of RA flare was only 12.9% (n=24) in which 14 were self-reported and 10 were physician-reported flares (4 severe flare, 6 mild-moderate flare). Flare rates were higher during the first and second dose of vaccination with 29.2% respectively, and only 12.5% were reported after booster vaccination. Common vaccine adverse effects were fever (16.8%), myalgia (8.6%) and arthralgia (6.4%). There were no significant differences in the occurrence of flare post-vaccination between age, gender, disease activity prior to vaccination, types of vaccine, usage of MTX and prednisolone, and discontinuation of MTX post-vaccination. Although seropositivity did not exhibit statistically significant flare rate post vaccination, sub-analysis revealed four times higher rate of flare in those who has double positivity compared to seronegative RA patients (12% vs 4%).ConclusionPrevelance of RA flare post-COVID-19 vaccination in Malaysian RA population is low. No significant associated risk factors were identified although double seropositivity appeared to have higher number of flares.References[1]Bixio, R., Bertelle, D., Masia, M., Pistillo, F., Carletto, A. and Rossini, M. (2021), Incidence of Disease Flare After BNT162b2 Coronavirus Disease 2019 Vaccination in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis in Remission. ACR Open Rheumatology, 3: 832-833.[2]Li X, Tong X, Yeung WWY, Kuan P, Yum SHH, Chui CSL, Lai FTT, Wan EYF, Wong CKH, Chan EWY, Lau CS, Wong ICK. Two-dose COVID-19 vaccination and possible arthritis flare among patients with rheumatoid arthritis in Hong Kong. Ann Rheum Dis. 2022 Apr;81(4):564-568.Acknowledgements:NIL.Disclosure of InterestsNone Declared.

IMPACT OF THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC ON ADHERENCE TO DISEASE MODIFYING DRUGS AMONG PATIENTS WITH RHEUMATIC DISEASES: A POPULATION-BASED, INTERRUPTED TIME SERIES ANALYSIS

BackgroundAlthough studies have quantified adherence to medications among patients with rheumatic diseases (RD) during the COVID-19, lack of direct pre-pandemic comparison precludes understanding of impact of the pandemic.ObjectivesOur objective was to evaluate the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on adherence to disease modifying drugs (DMARDs) including conventional synthetic (csDMARDs) and targeted synthetic (tsDMARDs).MethodsWe linked population-based health data on all physician visits, hospital admissions, and all dispensed medications, regardless of payer in British Columbia from 01/01/1996 to 3/31/2021. We identified prescriptions for csDMARDs (including methotrexate, hydroxychloroquine) and tsDMARDs, namely anti-TNFs (including infliximab, etanercept, adalimumab) and rituximab using drug identification numbers among indicated individuals with RD. We defined March 11, 2020, as the ‘index date' which corresponded to the date that mitigation measures for the COVID-19 pandemic were first introduced. We assessed adherence as proportion days covered (PDC), calculated monthly in the 12 months before and 12 months after the index date. We used interrupted time-series models, namely segmented regression to estimate changes and trends in adherence before and after the index date.ResultsOur analysis showed that the mean PDCs for all included DMARDs stayed relatively steady in the 12 months before and after mitigation measures were introduced (see Table 1). Adherence was highest among anti-TNFs, methotrexate, and azathioprine. Anti-TNFs were on a downward trajectory 12 months prior to the index date. Interrupted time-series modeling demonstrated statistically significant differences in the trends in PDCs post- vs. pre-mitigation measures for all anti-TNFS (slope [∂]: 1.38, standard error [SE]: 0.23), infliximab (∂: 1.35, SE: 0.23), adalimumab (∂: 0.82, SE: 0.25), and etanercept (∂: 1.07, SE: 0.25) (see Figure 1a). Conversely, the csDMARDs were on a flatter trajectory, and methotrexate (∂: -0.53, SE: 0.16), leflunomide (∂: 0.43, SE: 0.08), mycophenolate (∂: -1.26, SE: 0.48), cyclophosphamide (∂: 0.29, SE: 0.05), minocycline (∂: 0.04, SE: 0.02), chloroquine (∂: 0.02, SE: 0.00) showed statistically significant changes in estimated PDC trajectory after mitigation measures were introduced (see Figure 1b).ConclusionThis population-based study demonstrates that messaging and pandemic mitigation measures did not affect adherence to DMARDs.Table 1.Mean PDC 1 year before and after mitigation measures for the COVID-19 pandemic were introduced.MedicationMean PDC (%) 12 months before index dateMean PDC (%) 12 months after index datecsDMARDsmethotrexate28.926.8azathioprine21.819.5sulfasalazine16.214.9leflunomide14.313.0cyclosporine13.711.5hydroxychloroquine10.59.6mycophenolate4.52.9antimalarials4.43.9penicillamine3.53.4cyclophosphamide1.50.7chlorambucil1.20.4minocycline1.10.9gold0.50.2chloroquine0.10.0tsDMARDsanti-TNFs52.149.2infliximab41.838.3adalimumab40.336.8etanercept31.828.9rituximab3.42.9REFERENCES:NIL.Acknowledgements:NIL.Disclosure of InterestsNone Declared.

SAFETY OF BIVALENT SARS-COV-2 VACCINES AS A SECOND BOOSTER DOSE IN ARTHRITIS PATIENTS ON IMMUNOSUPPRESSIVE THERAPIES

BackgroundSafety and efficacy of updated bivalent vaccines, containing both the original vaccine variant of SARS-CoV-2 Spike and either Omicron variants BA.1 or BA.4/5, are of particular interest in arthritis patients on immunosuppressive therapies. With the continuous emergence of new viral variants, it is important to evaluate whether updated vaccines induce more adverse events in this patient group.ObjectivesTo examine if a second booster dose with updated bivalent vaccine increases the risk of adverse events, compared to the first booster dose with monovalent vaccines.MethodsThe prospective Nor-vaC study investigates vaccine responses in patients with immune mediated inflammatory diseases using immunosuppressive therapies (1). The present analyses included arthritis patients who received two booster doses. Patients received available vaccines according to the Norwegian vaccination program. The current recommendation in the Norwegian arthritis population is a three-dose primary vaccination series followed by two booster doses. Adverse events following vaccines doses were self-reported through questionnaires. Adverse events following the first (monovalent) and second (bivalent) booster were compared with McNemar's test.ResultsBetween 7th of July 2021 and 6th of December 2022 a total of 243 arthritis patients (127 rheumatoid arthritis, 65 psoriatic arthritis, 51 spondyloarthritis) on immunosuppressive therapies (Table 1) received a first, monovalent (BNT162b2, mRNA-1273) and a second, bivalent booster dose (BNT162b2 (WT/OMI BA.1), mRNA-1273.214, BNT162b2 (WT/OMI BA.4/BA.5)). Adverse events were recorded within 2 weeks in all patients (Figure 1). In total, 45 vs 49 (19% vs 20 %) patients reported any adverse event after a second, bivalent booster dose, compared to the first, monovalent booster, respectively. There was no significant difference in adverse events overall (p= 0.57). The most common adverse events after the second booster were pain at injection site (12 %), flu-like symptoms (9 %) and headache (6 %). No new safety signals emerged. A total of 15 (6 %) patients reported a disease flare after receiving the second, bivalent booster, compared to 21 (8 %) after the first, monovalent booster.ConclusionThere was no difference in adverse events between the monovalent, first booster, and the bivalent, second booster, indicating that bivalent vaccines are safe in this patient group.Reference[1]Syversen S.W. et al Arthritis Rheumatol 2022Table 1.Demographic characteristics and immunosuppressive medication in patients receiving a 1st monovalent and a 2nd bivalent booster dose.CharacteristicsPatients, n (%)Total243Age (years), median (IQR)61 (52-67)Female152 (63)Immunosuppressive medicationTNFi monoa75 (31)TNFi comboa+b72 (30)Methotrexate62 (26)Rituximab9 (4)IL-inhibitorsc6 (2)JAK-inhibitorsd11 (5)Othere8 (3)1st boosterBNT162b2106 (44)mRNA-1273137 (56)2nd boosterBNT162b2 (WT/OMI BA.1)65 (25)BNT162b2 (WT/OMI BA.4/BA.5)120 (47)mRNA-1273.214 (WT/OMI BA.1)58 (23)Results in n (%) unless otherwise specified.aTumor necrosis factor inhibitors: infliximab, etanercept, adalimumab, golimumab, certolizumab pegol.bCombination therapy: methotrexate, sulfasalazine, leflunomide, azathioprine.cInterleukin inhibitors: tocilizumab, secukinumab.dJanus kinase inhibitors: filgotinib, baricitinib, upadacitinib, tofacitinib.eOther: abatacept, sulfasalazine, leflunomide, azathioprine.Figure 1.Adverse events after bivalent vaccine as a 2nd booster dose compared to a monovalent vaccine as a 1st booster dose.[Figure omitted. See PDF]AcknowledgementsWe thank the patients and health-care workers who have participated in the Norwegian study of vaccine response to COVID-19. We thank the patient representatives in the study group, Kristin Isabella Kirkengen Espe and Roger Thoresen. We thank all study personnel, laboratory personnel, and other staff involved at the clinical departments involved, particularly Synnøve Aure, Margareth Sveinsson, May Britt Solem, Elisabeth Røssum-Haaland, and Kjetil Bergsmark.Disclosure of InterestsHilde Ørbo: None declared, Ingrid Jyssum: None declared, Anne Therese Tveter: None declared, Ingrid E. Christensen: None declared, Joseph Sexton: None declared, Kristin Hammersbøen Bjørlykke Speakers bureau: Janssen-Cilag, Grete B. Kro: None declared, Tore K. Kvien Speakers bureau: Amgen, Celltrion, Egis, Evapharma, Ewopharma, Hikma, Oktal, Sandoz, Sanofi, Consultant of: AbbVie, Biogen, Celltrion, Eli Lilly, Gilead, Mylan, Novartis, Pfizer, Sandoz, Sanofi, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Amgen, BMS MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, Ludvig A. Munthe Speakers bureau: Novartis, Cellgene, Gunnveig Grodeland Speakers bureau: Bayer, Sanofi, ThermoFisher, Consultant of: AstraZeneca, Siri Mjaaland: None declared, John Torgils Vaage: None declared, Espen A Haavardsholm Speakers bureau: Pfizer, UCB, Consultant of: AbbVie, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Gilead, Kristin Kaasen Jørgensen Speakers bureau: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Roche, Sella Aarrestad Provan: None declared, Silje Watterdal Syversen: None declared, Guro Løvik Goll Speakers bureau: AbbVie/Abbott, Galapagos, Pfizer, UCB, Consultant of: AbbVie/Abbott, Galapagos, Pfizer, UCB.

Drug discovery for coronavirus disease 2019 based on text mining and biomedical databases.

Objective Based on text mining technology and biomedical database, data mining and analysis of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) were carried out, and COVID-19 and its main symptoms related to fever, cough and respiratory disorders were explored. Methods The common targets of COVID-19 and its main symptoms cough, fever and respiratory disorder were obtained by GenCLiP 3 website, Gene ontology in metascape database (GO) and pathway enrichment analysis, then STRING database and Cytoscape software were used to construct the protein interaction network of common targets, the core genes were screened and obtained. DGIdb database and Symmap database were used to predict the therapeutic drugs of traditional Chinese and Western medicine for the core genes. Results A total of 28 gene targets of COVID-19 and its main symptoms were obtained, including 16 core genes such as IL2, IL1B and CCL2. Through the screening of DGIdb database, 28 chemicals interacting with 16 key targets were obtained, including thalidomide, leflunomide and cyclosporine et al. And 70 kinds of Chinese meteria medica including Polygonum cuspidatum, Astragalus membranaceus and aloe. Conclusion The pathological mechanism of COVID-19 and its main symptoms may be related to 28 common genes such as CD4, KNG1 and VEGFA, which may participate in the pathological process of COVID-19 by mediating TNF, IL-17 and other signal pathways. Potentially effective drugs may play a role in the treatment of COVID-19 through action related target pathway.Copyright © 2022 Tianjin Press of Chinese Herbal Medicines. All Rights Reserved.

Covid 19 in Patients with Rheumatic Diseases

Objectives: BIOBADAGUAY is the Paraguayan/Uruguayan registry of adverse events in patients with inflammatory rheumatic conditions under biologic therapy (BT). Three years have elapsed from the first case of coronavirus and data about South American patients with COVID are still scarce. In this study we analyzed the frequency and clinical outcomes of COVID-19 in a cohort of patients with rheumatic diseases from Paraguay. Method(s): A cross sectional study of Paraguayan patients with rheumatic diseases from BIOBADAGUAY and controls without BT. Clinical, epidemiological, and COVID-19 data were analyzed. Only cases confirmed by SARSCoV-2 positive PCR test were included. Descriptive analysis were performed for this study. Result(s): 832 patients were included (696 under BT and 136 controls). 116 (13.9%) had COVID-19. 22 had a second infection and 9 a third reinfection. Table 1 shows characteristic of COVID-19 patients. The most frequent diagnosis was rheumatoid arthritis (n = 93, 80.2%) followed by ankylosing spondylitis (n = 6, 5.2%), undifferentiated spondylarthritis (n = 5, 4.3%), psoriatic arthritis (n = 4, 3.4%), juvenile onset arthritis (n = 2, 1.7%), vasculitis (n = 2, 1.7%). Only 1 case (0.8%) were registered for Still's disease, enteropathic spondylarthritis, systemic sclerosis and seronegative polyarthritis, respectively. When comorbidities were analyzed, 46 (39.6%) patients had at least one (Table 1). Of the total treatments received: 65 (56.0%) had methotrexate, 53 (45.7%) leflunomide, 3 (2.5%) sulfasalazine, 15 (12.9%) hydroxychloroquine, 25 (21.5%) glucocorticoid, 52 (44.8%) anti-TNF and 20 (17.2%) non-anti-TNF. COVID-19 severity outcomes were: 101(87%) non severe, 31 (26.7%) severe and 1 fatal(0.8%). 189 (90.9%) patients received vaccination and the mean number of doses were 2.5 doses. 55 (26.4%) had COVID prior to vaccination Conclusion(s): In this study we examined the frequency of COVID-19 in Paraguayan patients with rheumatic diseases. In this cohort of rheumatologic patients, COVID 19 severity was similar to the one in the general population.

Humoral Immune Response to Sars-Cov-2 Third Vaccine in Patients with Autoimmune Rheumatic Diseases without Seroconversion after the Initial 2-Dose Regimen

Objectives: To evaluate the humoral immune response to the third dose (booster) of vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 in patients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases who were seronegative after a two-dose regimen. Method(s): Observational study. Patients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases who had not achieved seroconversion after a two-dose vaccine schedule against SARS-CoV-2 were included. To assess the humoral immune response, anti-RBD IgG (S protein receptor binding domain) neutralizing antibody titers were determined by ELISA (cutoff titer 200). The determination was made between 30 to 45 days after the third dose. Result(s): From 66 patients who received SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, 18 patients (29.5%) were seronegative after a two-dose schedule. 61% had SLE, 77% had comorbidities (61% with hypertension, p = 0.03). Patients were on treatment: 10 with prednisone (8 with doses greater than 10 mg/d, p = 0.01), 10 with hydroxychloroquine, one with methotrexate, one with leflunomide, four with azathioprine, five with my cophenolatemofetil and five with rituximab (they are the total number of non-responders on biological treatment, p = 0.03). Regarding the primary vaccination regimen, 11 received BBIBP-CorV (p = 0.01), 5 AZD1222, 1 Gam-COVID-Vac and 1 mRNA1273/Gam-COVID-Vac heterologous scheme. Of these 18 non-responders, 14 received a third dose;nine patients (62%) presented anti-RBD IgG detectable. Of the five patients who did not respond to the booster vaccination, three had received BBIBP-CorV as the initial schedule and the vaccines applied as a third dose were Ad5-nCoV (1), BNT162b2 (1), AZD 1222 (2) and Gam-COVID-Vac (1). They were being treated with: rituximab (2), azathioprine (2) and mycophenolate mofetil (1). Treatment with higher doses of prednisone was the only factor associated with non-seroconversion to the third dose (8 +/- 4.5;p 0.02). Conclusion(s): The third dose of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine allowed to improve the serological response to vaccination, achieving a seroconversion of 62% in this group of patients.

Immune Responses to Mrna Vaccines against Sars-Cov2 in Patients with Immune-Mediated Inflammatory Rheumatic Diseases

Background/Aims Patients with immune-mediated rheumatic diseases (IMRD) are commonly treated with immunosuppressors and are prone to infections. Recently introduced mRNA SARS-Cov2 vaccines have demonstrated extraordinary efficacy across all ages. Immunosuppressed patients were excluded from phase III trials with SARS-We aim to fully characterize B and T cell immune responses elicited by mRNA SARS-Cov2 vaccines in patients with rheumatic diseases under immunotherapies, and to identify which drugs reduce vaccine's immunogenicity. Methods Humoral, CD4 and CD8 immune responses were investigated in 147 SARS-Cov2-naive patients with selected rheumatic diseases under immunosuppression after a two-dose regimen of SARS-Cov2 mRNA vaccine. Responses were compared with age, gender, and diseasematched IMRD patients not receiving immunosuppressors and with healthy controls Results IMRD patients showed decreased seroconversion rates (63% vs 100%, p=0.04) and cellular immune responses (59% vs 100%, p=0.007). Patients on methotrexate achieved seroconversion in 62% of cases and cellular responses in 80% of cases. Abatacept deeply affected humoral and cellular responses. Rituximab (31% responders) and belimumab (50% responders) showed severely impaired humoral responses but cellular responses were often preserved. Antibody titers were reduced with mycophenolate and azathioprine but preserved with leflunomide. Conclusion IMRD patients exhibit impaired SARS-CoV-2 vaccine-immunogenicity, variably reduced with immunosuppressors. Among commonly used therapies, abatacept and B-cell depleting therapies show the most deleterious effects, while anticytokines preserved immunogenicity. The effects of cumulative methotrexate and glucocorticoid doses on immunogenicity should be considered. Humoral and cellular responses are weakly correlated, but CD4 and CD8 tightly correlate. Seroconversion alone might not reflect the vaccine's immunogenicity.

Incidence and Management of Inflammatory Arthritis in England before and during the Covid- 19 Pandemic: A Population-Level Cohort Study Using Opensafely

Background/Aims The impact of the pandemic on the incidence and management of inflammatory arthritis (IA) is not understood. Routinely-captured data in secure platforms, such as OpenSAFELY, offer unique opportunities to understand how IA was impacted upon by the pandemic. Our objective was to use OpenSAFELY to assess the effects of the pandemic on diagnostic incidence and care delivery for IA in England, and replicate key metrics from the National Early Inflammatory Arthritis Audit. Methods With the approval of NHS England, we used primary care and hospital data for 17 million adults registered with general practices using TPP health record software, to explore the following outcomes between 1 April 2019 and 31 March 2022: 1) incidence of IA diagnoses (rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, axial spondyloarthritis, undifferentiated IA) recorded in primary care;2) time to first rheumatology assessment;3) time to first prescription of a conventional synthetic DMARD (csDMARD) in primary care, and choice of first csDMARD. Results From 17,683,500 adults (representing 40% of the English population), there were 31,280 incident IA diagnoses recorded between April 2019 and March 2022. New IA diagnoses decreased by 39.7% in the early months of the pandemic. Overall, a 20.3% decrease in IA diagnoses was seen in the year commencing April 2020, relative to the preceding year (5.1 vs. 6.4 diagnoses per 10,000 adults, respectively). Further decreases coincided with rising COVID-19 numbers, before returning to pre-pandemic levels by the end of the study period. No rebound increase in IA incidence was observed as of April 2022. The median time from referral to first rheumatology assessment was shorter during the pandemic (18 days;IQR 8-35 days) than before (21 days;9-41 days). The proportion of patients prescribed csDMARDs in primary care was comparable to before the pandemic;however, fewer people were prescribed methotrexate or leflunomide, and more were prescribed sulfasalazine or hydroxychloroquine. Conclusion IA diagnoses decreased markedly during the early phase of the pandemic;however, the impact on rheumatology assessment times and DMARD prescribing was less marked than might have been anticipated. This study demonstrates the feasibility of using routinelycaptured, near real-time data in the secure OpenSAFELY platform to benchmark care quality on a national scale, without the need for manual data collection.

Teriflunomide and COVID-19: A Friend or Foe?!

Unfortunately, the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has become an irritating universal crisis. Thus, the discovery/identification of prospective drug candidates to disband the branched health issues caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection has become urgent. This current research sheds light on the repositioning possibility of the potent antirheumatic drug teriflunomide to act as an efficient anti-SARS-CoV-2/anti-COVID-19 remedy. Herein, a motivating in silico molecular docking/modeling study of teriflunomide explores its potential inhibitory actions on the novel coronaviral-2 RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (nCoV-RdRp) enzyme/protein was reported. Interestingly, the computational analysis of the teriflunomide superior inhibitory binding mode in the binding cavity of one of the active sites of the nCoV-RdRp detected that teriflunomide molecule shows considerably stronger inhibitory binding interactions and better inhibitory binding affinities (it shows lower binding energies which reached-9.70 kcal/mol) than both used references. It was reported that teriflunomide potently impairs viral replication/reproduction by employing two distinct action mechanisms. Thus, the existing study's findings surprisingly uphold teriflunomide's double mode of action. In conclusion, the presented research work paves the way to biologically and clinically begin exploring the promising properties of teriflunomide to strongly hit the SARS-CoV-2 particles of the different strains and inhibit their pathogenic replication in an integrative triple mode of action. Hopingly, the potential sextet COVID-19 attacker teriflunomide can be rapidly subjected to the various in vitro/in vivo/clinical anti-COVID-19 assays/trials in a serious attempt to assess its comprehensive bioactivities against COVID-19 to be effectively used in SARS-CoV-2 infections therapy soon. © 2022 by the authors.

Leflunomide Confers Rapid Recovery from COVID-19 and is Coupled with Temporal Immunologic Changes.

Background: Vaccines for SARS-CoV-2 have been considerably effective in reducing rates of infection and severe COVID-19. However, many patients, especially those who are immunocompromised due to cancer or other factors, as well as individuals who are unable to receive vaccines or are in resource-poor countries, will continue to be at risk for COVID-19. We describe clinical, therapeutic, and immunologic correlatives in two patients with cancer and severe COVID-19 who were treated with leflunomide after failing to respond to standard-of-care comprising remdesivir and dexamethasone. Both patients had breast cancer and were on therapy for the malignancy. Methods: The protocol is designed with the primary objective to assess the safety and tolerability of leflunomide in treating severe COVID-19 in patients with cancer. Leflunomide dosing consisted of a loading dose of 100 mg daily for the first three days, followed by daily dosing, at the assigned dose level (Dose Level 1: 40 mg, Dose Level -1, 20 mg; Dose Level 2, 60 mg), for an additional 11 days. At defined intervals, serial monitoring of blood samples for toxicity, pharmacokinetics, and immunologic correlative studies were performed, as well as nasopharyngeal swabs for PCR analysis of SARS-CoV-2. Results: Preclinically, leflunomide impaired viral RNA replication, and clinically, it led to a rapid improvement in the two patients discussed herein. Both patients completely recovered, with minimal toxicities; all adverse events experienced were considered unrelated to leflunomide. Single-cell mass-cytometry analysis showed that leflunomide increased levels of CD8+ cytotoxic and terminal effector T cells and decreased naïve and memory B cells. Conclusions: With ongoing COVID-19 transmission and occurrence of breakthrough infections in vaccinated individuals, including patients with cancer, therapeutic agents that target both the virus and host inflammatory response would be helpful despite the availability of currently approved anti-viral agents. Furthermore, from an access to care perspective, especially in resource-limited areas, an inexpensive, readily available, effective drug with existing safety data in humans is relevant in the real-world setting.

Nail ridging in rheumatoid arthritis patients and relation to disease activity: An integrated rheumatology-dermatology multi-centre study

Aim of the work: To evaluate the frequency of nail ridging (NR) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and to study its relation to disease activity. Patients and methods: 230 RA patients and 97 matched controls from Helwan, Ain Shams and Mansoura university hospitals were studied. Disease activity score (DAS28) was assessed. NR has been searched for in all patients. The number of affected fingers was recorded. NR was determined by a magnifying lens, seen by naked eye or seen and felt. Dermoscopic photography of the NR using Dermalite DL4 3Gen dermatoscope has been recorded. Results: The median age of patients was 49 years (42–58 years);they were 221 females and 19 males (F:M 11.1:1) with a disease duration 9 years (5–11 years). Their DAS28 was 3.6 (2.9–4.6). NR was significantly increased in RA cases vs. control;73% vs 20%;p < 0.001. In patients, NR was detected by a magnifying lens in 32.6%, seen in 27% and seen and felt in 13.5%. Joint deformities were significantly higher in those with NR. DAS28 was a significant independent predictor of NR;for every one-point increase in DAS28, there was a 153 times higher odds to exhibit NR at a sensitivity of 93.5%, specificity 80.3% and at a diagnostic accuracy of 90%. Conclusion: NR is a frequent finding in RA. An integrated rheumatological- dermatological clinical evaluation may be helpful and further studies are required to prove the importance of this sign for follow up of RA patients.

Leflunomide: Traditional immunosuppressant with concurrent antiviral effects.

Leflunomide is a classic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug that is widely used to treat autoimmune diseases. Studies also show its antiviral effects in in vitro and/or in vivo experiments. Considering glucocorticoids, immunosuppressants and newly emerged antibodies commonly used in autoimmune diseases and autoinflammatory disorders bring risk of infection such as viral infection, leflunomide with combination of anti-viral and immunosuppressive features to maintain the balance between infection and anti-inflammation are attractive. Here we summarize the actions and mechanisms of leflunomide in immunoregulatory and antiviral effects.

The prevalence of rheumatoid arthritis (ra) flare post covid-19 vaccination in malaysian population and the associated risk factors

Background: Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) flare post-COVID- 19 vaccination has been reported and poses a great concern among patients. This study aims to evaluate the prevalence of RA flare post COVID-19 vaccination and its associated risk factors. Method(s): This was a cross-sectional questionnaire-based study assessing RA flare based on patient self-report disease flare or documented physician assessment (physician-reported flare). The study was conducted from May to July 2022 in Hospital Putrajaya and recruited RA patients who received at least one dose of COVID-19 vaccine under the Malaysian National Vaccination Programme. Patient self-reported disease flare was defined as 'a sudden worsening of rheumatology condition or arthritis within 1 month post-vaccination' while physician-reported flare was defined as 'an increment of disease activity score 28-joint (DAS28 CRP/ESR) documented within 3 months post-vaccination' from either a scheduled or unscheduled clinic visit. Demographic data, vaccination history and disease parameters were retrieved from electronic medical records. Statistical analysis included descriptive and univariate analyses were performed using SPSS. Result(s): A total of 186 patients were enrolled. Majority (93%) were female with the mean age of 58 years old (standard deviation, SD 12.2). Most patients were seropositive (66% Rheumatoid factor, 63% anti-citrullinated peptide antibodies) with mean disease duration of 12 years (SD 7.7). Majority were on methotrexate (MTX) (71%), 21.5% were on leflunomide and only 4.8% were on biologics or targeted synthetic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs. A small proportion of patients were on steroids (14%). Half of the patients were in remission prior to vaccination. All patients completed 2 doses of vaccination in which 62% received Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine followed by Sinovac (coronaVac) vaccine (24.6%) and Oxford-AstraZaneca vaccine (13.4%). Only 80% received booster dose, of which 88.7% was Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine. A total of 52 patients who were on MTX therapy discontinued the drug post-vaccination for a week duration. The prevalence of flare was only 12.9% (n: 24) in which 14 were self-reported and 10 were physician-reported flares (4 severe flare, 6 mild-moderate flare). Majority of flares occurred during the first and second dose of vaccination with 29.2% respectively, and only 12.5% were reported after booster vaccination. There were no significant differences in the occurrence of flare post-vaccination between age, gender, disease activity prior to vaccination, types of vaccine, usage of MTX and steroids, and discontinuation of MTX post-vaccination. Conclusion(s): Prevelance of RA flare post-COVID- 19 vaccination is low and there were no significant associated risk factors identified in this study.

Humoral immunogenicity of mRNA booster after heterogenous CoronaVac-ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 or homologous ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine in autoimmune rheumatic diseases patients

Background/Purpose: The immunogenicity data of mRNA SARS-CoV- 2 vaccine boosted after completed primary series beyond mRNA vaccine in autoimmune rheumatic disease (ARDs) patients is sparse. We report the vaccine immunogenicity of SAR-CoV2 mRNA vaccine booting after completed heterologous CoronaVac followed by ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (SV-AZ) or homologous ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccination (AZ-AZ). Method(s): The levels of SARS-CoV- 2 anti-RBD IgG were evaluated at one and three months after mRNA vaccine booster in adults with ARDs who completed the heterologous CoronaVac-ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine (n = 19) or homologous ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (n = 13) within 90-180 days. All patients were received at least one immunosuppressive drug as follows: prednisolone <20 mg/day, methotrexate >=10 mg/week, azathioprine >=50 mg/day, mycophenolate mofetil >=1,000 mg/day, or leflunomide >=10 mg/day, as a stable dose for a month prior vaccination. Anti-RBD antibody was measured. Seropositivity was defined as IgG >=42 binding antibody units (BAU)/ mL. Disease activity was evaluated. Result(s): Among 33 ARDs, 78.8% were female, mean (SD) age was 42.9 years. Half of them were SLE (54.5%). Most patients received corticosteroid (75.8%), mean (IQR) dose of 7.5 (5, 7.5) mg/day of prednisolone. The immunosuppressive drugs used were as follows;azathioprine (45.5%), methotrexate (39.4%) and mycophenolate mofetil (21.2%). The anti-RBD IgG was positive in all SV-AZ group while one patient in AZ-AZ who received mycophenolate mofetil was seronegative. At one-month post mRNA booster, the median (IQR) anti-RBD IgG levels trended to be lower among patients with AZ-AZ than among SV-AZ primary series (1867.8 [591.6, 2548.6] vs. 3735.8 [2347.9, 5014.0] BAU/mL, P = 0.061). Mean (SD) anti-RBD IgG level in the AZ-AZ group was significantly lower than SV-AZ group at three-month post mRNA boosters (597.8 [735.5] vs. 1609.9 [828.4] BAU/mL, P = 0.003). Disease flare-ups occurred in six patients (18.2%), and all were minor flares. Conclusion(s): Our findings demonstrated satisfactory humoral immunogenicity of mRNA booster after primary series with the vaccine strategies rather than mRNA platform. SAR-CoV2 vaccine-induced immunity trend to lower in AZ-AZ primary series. The fourth dose in this subgroup might be a consideration without delay. However, this finding needs to be confirmed by a larger study. (Table Presented).

INADEQUATE IMMUNE RESPONSE TO COVID-19 VACCINES IN THE PRESENCE OF DISEASE-MODIFYING ANTIRHEUMATIC DRUGS (DMARDS)

SESSION TITLE: Issues After COVID-19 Vaccination Case Posters SESSION TYPE: Case Report Posters PRESENTED ON: 10/19/2022 12:45 pm - 01:45 pm INTRODUCTION: Since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, vaccines were introduced to mitigate the spread of the virus. Depending on the COVID-19 vaccine, regimens consist of one dose (ie, J&J) or two doses (ie, Pfizer and Moderna) and is followed by a third dose/booster (for immunocompromised/immunocompetent individuals). Here, we present a case of COVID-19 infection in a triple vaccinated patient with concurrent rheumatoid arthritis (RA) receiving disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) who was unable to mount an adequate immune response to the vaccine. CASE PRESENTATION: Patient is a 67 year old male with PMH of RA (on DMARDs) presented to the ED with complaints of shortness of breath. He was on treatment for RA with leflunomide, rituximab and prednisone. He was COVID-19 triple vaccinated. In ED, the patient was found to be hypoxic, saturating at 87% on room air with a respiratory rate of 18. Physical examination was significant for coarse breath sounds bilaterally and remaining vitals were unremarkable. Patient was initially placed on 3 L oxygen via NC but due to persistent hypoxia, was transitioned to high-flow nasal cannula. Further investigations revealed that the patient was COVID-19 positive. He was treated with remdesivir and dexamethasone. His oxygen requirements continued to escalate and he was ultimately intubated. While in the ICU, the patient's hypoxia continued to worsen despite optimal medical and ventilatory management and he subsequently died. DISCUSSION: DMARDs are a group of medications used to slow the progression of rheumatoid arthritis. They work by reducing the immune response of B cells, T cells and cytokines. Our patient was on two commonly prescribed medications for rheumatoid arthritis, leflunomide and rituximab. The former acts by inhibiting the pyrimidine synthesis pathway, thereby decreasing T lymphocyte production and the latter depletes CD-20 positive B cells. While there is limited data on COVID-19 vaccine, it has been established that patients on DMARDs have reduced antibody titres after immunization against influenza and pneumonia vaccinations [1, 2]. A study assessing the effectiveness of a third vaccine dose in patients taking rituximab vs placebo found a significant difference in seroconversion (78.8% vs 18.2%, p=<0.0001) and neutralizing activity (80.0% vs 21.9%, p=<0.0001) [3]. In our case, the patient was on two immunosuppressive drugs which suppressed both the humoral and cell mediated immunity, resulting in an inadequate immune response and subsequently developing COVID. CONCLUSIONS: This case highlights patients on immunosuppressant therapy failing to mount an adequate immune response to the COVID-19 vaccine, warranting more booster doses in patients on DMARDs. Reference #1: Adler S, Krivine A, Weix J et al. Protective effect of A/ H1N1 vaccination in immune-mediated disease–a prospectively controlled vaccination study. Rheumatology 2012;51:695–700. Reference #2: Franca ILA, Ribeiro ACM, Aikawa NE et al. TNF blockers show distinct patterns of immune response to the pandemic influenza A H1N1 vaccine in inflammatory arthritis patients. Rheumatology 2012;51:2091–8. Reference #3: David S, Koray T, Filippo F et al. Efficacy and safety of SARS-CoV-2 revaccination in non-responders with immune-mediated inflammatory disease. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2021-221554 DISCLOSURES: No relevant relationships by Gursharan Kaur No relevant relationships by Aishwarya Krishnaiah No relevant relationships by sandeep mandal

LEFLUNOMIDE-INDUCED COLITIS IN IMMUNOSUPPRESSED PATIENT WITH SYSTEMIC LUPUS ERYTHEMATOSUS AND RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS

Background: Leflunomide is an oral disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD), with anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory properties that has been in use since 1998. Common leflunomide side-effects include gastrointestinal symptoms (nausea, abdominal pain and diarrhea), occurring in 10-20% of patients treated with leflunomide. Scarce evidence exists that leflunomide can cause colitis. Aims: We present the case of a 61-year-old female, with Lupus Erythematosus who presented with colitis induced by long-term leflunomide treatment. Methods: Case report and review of literature Results: A 61-year-old female was seen by the gastroenterology team with complaints of diarrhea ongoing for 6 weeks associated with 10 lb weight loss. The patient had a complex medical history, including lupus, hypothyroidism, asthma, atrial fibrillation, recurrent C. difficile infection, Bell's palsy and avascular necrosis secondary to long-term corticosteroid therapy. Previous immunosuppressive therapies included prednisone, mycophenolic acid (Myfortic), hydroxychloroquine, azathioprine, mycophenolate (CellCept) but due to multiple intolerances, she was initiated on leflunomide in 2014 and has been maintained on it since. Stool analysis ruled out infectious causes. COVID-19 testing was also negative. A CT of the abdomen revealed pancolitis. This was confirmed on colonoscopy, which revealed mild, Mayo 1 pancolitis and normal terminal ileum. She was initiated on Mezavant as a treatment for possible ulcerative colitis. However, during the hospitalization her symptoms, worsened and bloody diarrhea was noted. She underwent a subsequent endoscopic evaluation which revealed more severe disease, Mayo 2-3 colitis, with mucosal hyperemia and ulcerations, as well as effacement of the vasculature. Initial pathology results revealed mild colitis, but repeat pathology results revealed moderate active colitis, with cryptitis, crypt abscesses and significant apoptosis consistent with drug-induced colitis. Given these findings, the diagnosis of leflunomide-induced colitis was made. Leflunomide was therefore discontinued, the patient was initiated on a higher dose of corticosteroids and cholestyramine was initiated. Following these measures, her diarrhea resolved. Conclusions: Leflunomide may cause diarrhea in up to 33% of patients. Challenges related to the diagnosis of leflunomide-induced colitis exist, including the rarity of the diagnosis, a not completely understood mechanism for acute leflunomide-induced diarrhea, as well as variable endoscopic and histologic findings associated with the diagnosis. This report illustrates a case of leflunomide-induced colitis which should be considered in patients on leflunomide, who present with symptoms of abdominal pain and diarrhea, even years after medication initiation.

LUNG INVOLVEMENT in VEXAS SYNDROME

Background: Vacuoles, E1 enzyme, X-linked, autoinfammatory, somatic (VEXAS) syndrome is a recently identifed disorder caused by somatic mutations in the UBA1 gene of myeloid cells. Various manifestations of pulmonary involvement have been reported, but a detailed description of lung involvement and radiologic fndings is lacking. Objectives: To describe lung involvement in VEXAS syndrome. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted of all patients iden-tifed at the Mayo Clinic with VEXAS syndrome since October 2020. Clinical records and chest high resolution computed tomography (HRCT) scans were reviewed. Results: Our cohort comprised 22 white men with a median age of 69 years (IQR 62-74, range 57-84). Hematologic disorders including multiple myeloma, myelodysplastic syndrome and pancytopenia were present in 10 patients (45%), rheumatologic diseases including granulomatosis with poly-angiitis, IgG4-related disease, polyarteritis nodosa, relapsing polychondritis, and rheumatoid arthritis were found in 10 patients (45%), and 4 patients had dermatologic presentations including Sweet syndrome, Schnitzer-like syndrome or drug rash with eosinophilia skin syndrome (DRESS). VEXAS syndrome-related features included fever (18, 82%), skin lesions (20, 91%), lung infiltrates (12, 55%), chondritis (10, 45%), venous thromboembolism (12, 55%), macrocytic anemia (21, 96%), and bone marrow vacuoles (21, 96%). Other manifestations observed were arthritis, scleritis, hoarseness and hearing loss. Median erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) was 69 mm/1st hour (IQR 34.3-118.8) and median C-reactive protein (CRP) of 55.5 mg/dL (IQR 11.4-98.8). The somatic mutations affecting methionine-41 (p.Met41) in UBA1 gene were: 11 (50%) p.Met41Thr, 7 (32%) p.Met41Val, 2 (9%) p.Met41Leu, and 2 (9%) in the splice site. All patients received glu-cocorticoids (GC) (median duration of treatment was 2.6 years);21 (96%) received conventional immunosuppressive agents (methotrexate, aza-thioprine, mycophenolate, leflunomide, cyclosporin, hydroxychloroquine, tofacitinib, ruxolitinib) and 9 (41%) received biologic agents (rituximab, tocilizumab, infliximab, etanercept, adalimumab, golimumab, abatacept). Respiratory symptoms included dyspnea and cough present in 21 (95%) and 12 (55%), respectively, and were documented prior to VEXAS diagnosis. Most of the patients were non-smokers (14, 64%) and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) was present in 11 patients (50%). Seven patients (32%) used non-invasive ventilation, 6 used C-PAP, and 1 used Bi-PAP. Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) was available in 4 patients, and the findings were compatible with neutrophilic alveolitis in 3. Two patients had lung biopsies (2 transbronchial and 1 surgical) that showed ATTR amyloidosis and organizing pneumonia with lymphoid interstitial pneumonia, respectively. Pulmonary function tests were available in 9 (41%) patients and showed normal results in 5;3 patients had isolated reduction in DLCO and 1 with mild restriction. On chest HRCT, 16 patients (73%) had parenchymal changes including ground-glass opacities in 9, septal thickening in 4, and nodules in 3;pleural effusions were present in 3 patients, air-trapping in 3 patients and tracheomalacia in 1 patient. Follow-up chest HRCT was available for 8 patients (36%), the ground-glass opacities resolved in 5 patients, 3 patients manifested new or increased ground-glass opacities, and 1 patient had increased interlobular septal thickening. After 1 year of follow-up, 4 patients (17%) had died;3 due to pneumonia (2 COVID-19,1 bacterial) and 1 due to heart failure. VEXAS flares occurred in 18 patients (82%), the maximum number of relapses was 7, and they were mainly managed with GC and with changes in the immuno-suppressive regimen. Conclusion: Pulmonary involvement was documented by chest HRCT in most patients with VEXAS syndrome. Respiratory symptoms occurred in over one half of patients and about 20% had PFT abnormalities. The pulmonary manifestations of VEXAS are nonspecifc and characterized predominantly by infamma-tory parenchymal involvement.

Saliva as Blood Alternative in Therapeutic Monitoring of Teriflunomide-Development and Validation of the Novel Analytical Method.

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is extremely helpful in individualizing dosage regimen of drugs with narrow therapeutic ranges. It may also be beneficial in the case of drugs characterized by serious side effects and marked interpatient pharmacokinetic variability observed with leflunomide and its biologically active metabolite, teriflunomide. One of the most popular matrices used for TDM is blood. A more readily accessible body fluid is saliva, which can be collected in a much safer way comparing to blood. This makes it especially advantageous alternative to blood during life-threatening SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. However, drug's saliva concentration is not always a good representation of its blood concentration. The aim of this study was to verify whether saliva can be used in TDM of teriflunomide. We also developed and validated the first reliable and robust LC-MS/MS method for quantification of teriflunomide in saliva. Additionally, the effect of salivary flow and swab absorptive material from the collector device on teriflunomide concentration in saliva was evaluated. Good linear correlation was obtained between the concentration of teriflunomide in plasma and resting saliva (p < 0.000016, r = 0.88), and even better between plasma and the stimulated saliva concentrations (p < 0.000001, r = 0.95) confirming the effectiveness of this non-invasive method of teriflunomide's TDM. The analyzed validation criteria were fulfilled. No significant influence of salivary flow (p = 0.198) or type of swab in the Salivette device on saliva's teriflunomide concentration was detected. However, to reduce variability the use of stimulated saliva and synthetic swabs is advised.

THE USE OF BIOLOGICAL DISEASE-MODIFYING ANTIRHEUMATIC DRUGS AND JANUS KINASE INHIBITORS IN RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS DURING THE COVID-19 CORONAVIRUS DISEASE PANDEMIC: DATA FROM A TELEPHONE SURVEY OF 254 PATIENTS

The prescribing of biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) and Janus kinase inhibitors (iJAK) during the COVID-19 pandemic requires a balanced approach and tight monitoring of the patients. The aim of the study was to study the effect of bDMARDs and iJAK inhibitors on the condition of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), taking the patients reported outcomes, as well as the incidence of COVID-19 in these patients. Materials and methods. A telephone survey was conducted of 254 patients with RA (average age – 49.8±13.7 years;64.4% of patients are positive for rheumatoid factor;women – 83.5%;DAS28 score – 5.4±1.6 points), who in the period from January 2020 to June 2021 were prescribed bDMARDs or iJAK for the first time: 148 (58.3%) – rituximab;57 (22.4%) – tumor necrosis factor α inhibitors;20 (7.9%) – iJAK;17 (6.7%) – interleukin 6 inhibitors;12 (4.7%) – abatacept. Results. At the time of the survey, 204 (80.3%) patients continued taking prescribed medications. The main reason for the interruption of treatment was administrative problems. Synthetic DMARDs (mainly methotrexate and leflunomide) were received by 68.0%, glucocorticoids – 45.3%, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs – 44.5% of respondents. Among patients treated with bDMARDs or iJAK, 68.1% noted «the state of symptoms acceptable to the patient», the absence of frequent joint pain – 65.3%, the absence of increased fatigue – 14.3%. The incidence of COVID-19 and hospitalization associated with this disease did not differ in individuals who continued and stopped using bDMARDs or iJAK: 41.2% and 44.6%, 13.7% and 14.0%, respectively (p=0.80884). There were no statistically significant differences in the incidence of COVID-19 and hospitalization associated with this disease in patients taking various bDMARDs or iJAK. Conclusion. Despite the COVID-19 pandemic, rituximab remains one of the most popular bDMARDs. About a third of patients receiving bDMARDs or iJAK are not satisfied with their condition. More than 40% of patients who received these drugs suffered COVID-19;14.0% required hospitalization.